I totally understand that people are willing to try anything which sounds promising. But the Bredesen protocol is definitely not the answer in my opinion if you are dealing with AD. What I find despicable is the way his work it is being presented by some — both in books suggesting “reversal of AD” or “surviving AD” or health companies claiming it to offer real hope for Alzheimer’s. Now, a study is being touted claiming to prove the protocol’s efficacy. From what I understand, it was a pre-publication. And it was not a top-notch journal like the JAM or The Lancet that will publish it. No doubt they would have been clamouring to be the first to report on such groundbreaking work had they thought it had any real merit for treatment. However, The Lancet did publish a critique titled “Can We Trust ‘The End of Alzheimer’s?’” Its author correctly claims that most of the things suggested in it do not require an expensive protocol to implement.
Last edited: