Back in 1971 my Mum took out a whole of life insurance policy. Its initial purpose was to pay out a lump sum to me in the event of her death and to provide me with an annual income until I reached the age of 21. (She was a single parent so wanted to ensure I wasn't left destitute!). In 1986, when I turned 21, it became simply a life insurance policy, to be paid out on her death.
Because I was a minor when the policy was taken out, Mum had to appoint a trustee named on the policy who would administer the funds in the event of Mum's death. The trustee was a friend of hers at the time.
The monthly premiums have been paid by Mum from 1971 until her death in June. I recently sent off Mum's will (I am her only beneficiary and executor), the original of the policy and the death certificate to the insurance company for settlement of the policy (I assumed). Not so! The insurance company have written back advising that they will only pay out to the named trustee and have provided me with a form for said trustee to sign and have witnessed. Said trustee is, I imagine long dead as she was older than Mum. They didn't even stay in touch beyond the 70's.
Maybe a salutary warning to anyone who might find themselves in a similar situation. I'm guessing that in 1986, the trustee should have been formally removed from the policy?
Because I was a minor when the policy was taken out, Mum had to appoint a trustee named on the policy who would administer the funds in the event of Mum's death. The trustee was a friend of hers at the time.
The monthly premiums have been paid by Mum from 1971 until her death in June. I recently sent off Mum's will (I am her only beneficiary and executor), the original of the policy and the death certificate to the insurance company for settlement of the policy (I assumed). Not so! The insurance company have written back advising that they will only pay out to the named trustee and have provided me with a form for said trustee to sign and have witnessed. Said trustee is, I imagine long dead as she was older than Mum. They didn't even stay in touch beyond the 70's.
Maybe a salutary warning to anyone who might find themselves in a similar situation. I'm guessing that in 1986, the trustee should have been formally removed from the policy?