The example you gave was one where there was a medical condition which needed to be reported and had been misdiagnosed - not one where the person had been diagnosed with a medical condition when they had none.
There is a world of difference.
In all the years I have been on TP I have always tried not to be pedantic, so please forgive me if I now appear to be so (I do consider myself to be reasonably intelligent
( though perhaps not the wisest on English grammar )
Perhaps members more intelligent than I can explain the ‘world of difference’ between
“ medical condition which needed to be reported and had been misdiagnosed - not one where the person had been diagnosed with a medical condition when they had none”
If a person had been reported as having a medical condition and it turned out he had none , surely he had been misdiagnosed ???????
I rather think I am trying to explain my own confusion here
Jimbo 111