My mother is currently in hospital with a nervous condition that's made her immobile and coupled with dementia and very poor eyesight it has made the last 3 years difficult for her. Whilst she was in hospital stage 4 pancreatic cancer was found during an ultra-scan with the usual 3 month life expectancy assessment. Since finding the cancer she has been scored for continuing healthcare has she can no longer return to her house due to being immobile. She didn't reach the score on the continuing healthcare checklist and so didn't proceed to the full assessment part.
The two documents I am going to quote from can be found on a web search, the forum wont allow me to insert a link.
My question regarding this matter, is that with the "NHS Continuing Healthcare Checklist" document, point 20 states "that if a individual's needs are likely to increase in the next 3 months this should be reflected in the columns selected" and in the "National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare and NHS-funded Nursing Care" document, point 38 states "Where it is considered that deterioration can reasonably be anticipated to occur before the next planned review, this should be documented and taken into account. This could result in immediate eligibility for NHS continuing healthcare (i.e. before the deterioration has actually occurred)."
I feel my mother has not been assessed and scored using the government guideline documents. When I challenged the person who did the assessment I was told that they had never heard of this protocol and they do it differently. At the time of assessment I was not present but I power of attorney over my mothers health.
How can this be so? Do CCGs follow different guidelines tailored to suit themselves? Or am I misreading the guidelines?
Your thoughts would be very welcome.
Thank You
The two documents I am going to quote from can be found on a web search, the forum wont allow me to insert a link.
My question regarding this matter, is that with the "NHS Continuing Healthcare Checklist" document, point 20 states "that if a individual's needs are likely to increase in the next 3 months this should be reflected in the columns selected" and in the "National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare and NHS-funded Nursing Care" document, point 38 states "Where it is considered that deterioration can reasonably be anticipated to occur before the next planned review, this should be documented and taken into account. This could result in immediate eligibility for NHS continuing healthcare (i.e. before the deterioration has actually occurred)."
I feel my mother has not been assessed and scored using the government guideline documents. When I challenged the person who did the assessment I was told that they had never heard of this protocol and they do it differently. At the time of assessment I was not present but I power of attorney over my mothers health.
How can this be so? Do CCGs follow different guidelines tailored to suit themselves? Or am I misreading the guidelines?
Your thoughts would be very welcome.
Thank You