Hi Geraldine – and welcome. It is good to have someone here who knows first hand of the ‘allegations’ raised in national publications. I may seem to criticise and challenge. It is not an end in itself. I am passionate about dementia care and for some years now always seen AS as the front runner in providing that in the UK – (although my mother gained no direct support as there was no local AS branch near us to begin with!) but when my loyalty is ’hanging by a thread’ – I do like to have answers. And I do like them to be public.
I, too, have questioned the fund-raising from the Tesco initiatives ... I am still waiting to be enlightened on how so much money is to be spent on Roadshows promoting services when so many services have been cut?
Like, why not use the money instead to directly
provide the services – plug the gaps that are being opened up - news of which would get round ‘like wildfire’ locally from SS/other charities/word of mouth without ‘investing’ hard earned cash and donations in launching such events to promote what isn’t there? (Or only now there at cost for those who can afford it?)
If only one good thing has come out of this, is that people, like myself, know if we wish to donate primarily to research we know which organisation to choose. I would also like to see – if TP and online support is clearly the ‘flagship’ it seems for AS – that isolated carers (and sufferers of course who might still be able to access the www) are enabled to access it. (Recycling laptops etc as other charities do, one example).
Constructive criticism, one hopes, leads to creative thinking?
Especially in these days of ‘austerity measures’ when every hard-earned penny has to count? It is increasingly important, IMHO, that if they wish to secure on-going support, ALL charities are transparent about their spend, let alone that they conduct themselves and treat their volunteers with the grace and respect they deserve?
Refraining from responding in a positive fashion to allegations or negative publicity is NOT helping the cause and only triggers more scepticism and concerns which will inevitably drive more supporters away?
Regards, (a concerned) Karen, x