Dear All
I just wanted to give you all the good news that our appeal for CHC was upheld by the Independent Review Panel (IRP) that met in November of last year. This was almost 2 and a half years after we first applied for CHC and almost a year after Dad passed away. The IRP concurred with our assessment of the DST Needs on 8/11 of the domains. They gave 1 Severe rating, 5 High and 5 Moderate in comparison to our PCT's ratings (which we knew were incorrect) of 3 High, 4 Moderate, 2 Low and 2 No Needs!!!
I would encourage anyone to persevere with an appeal if you feel an incorrect assessment has been made. Despite how long it took for us to get this result and the many hours/days/weeks/months I laboured over the initial appeal to the PCT and then the appeal to the IRP I feel vindicated!
I am not sure what the actual outcome means yet as the IRP sent their report to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and they were supposed to follow up with my brother (as I have returned to Australia) within a month. I have not had a chance to speak to my brother yet as he is overseas but I will keep this forum informed of the final outcome.
Thank you so much to those of you who supported me through this and especially to the Alz Soc volunteer who assisted me with the initial appeal.
Best wishes to everyone, Susan
I just wanted to give you all the good news that our appeal for CHC was upheld by the Independent Review Panel (IRP) that met in November of last year. This was almost 2 and a half years after we first applied for CHC and almost a year after Dad passed away. The IRP concurred with our assessment of the DST Needs on 8/11 of the domains. They gave 1 Severe rating, 5 High and 5 Moderate in comparison to our PCT's ratings (which we knew were incorrect) of 3 High, 4 Moderate, 2 Low and 2 No Needs!!!
I would encourage anyone to persevere with an appeal if you feel an incorrect assessment has been made. Despite how long it took for us to get this result and the many hours/days/weeks/months I laboured over the initial appeal to the PCT and then the appeal to the IRP I feel vindicated!
I am not sure what the actual outcome means yet as the IRP sent their report to the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and they were supposed to follow up with my brother (as I have returned to Australia) within a month. I have not had a chance to speak to my brother yet as he is overseas but I will keep this forum informed of the final outcome.
Thank you so much to those of you who supported me through this and especially to the Alz Soc volunteer who assisted me with the initial appeal.
Best wishes to everyone, Susan