So many variables
A good CH will supply stimulation, immediate response to any medical emergency, warmth, company, good food, cleanliness, personal hygiene, outings, activities. With all those plusses it would take a very big minus to weigh the scales in favour of home care.
Some people are a lot more wonderful than me and want to do it, but we would at best have Mum back in her own home with full-time carers. What would that bring? Upside, a little more independence. Downside? from past experience that would include wandering off at night and knocking on strangers' doors; not eating properly or at all; much lower standards of cleanliness; repeated claims that she hated the house and wanted to buy a new one (that was an expensive aborted exercise last time around!); falling out with and sacking of carers on a regular basis and - the biggie - not being any happier than she is now.
Of course if we didn't like the CH we wouldn't let her stay there. But it couldn't be better. She's bright and active when we are not there. Seeing friends and family triggers a "get me outta here" reaction which is difficult to deal with but as others have said can't be taken at face value. She's unhappy because of her condition (and actually she was never really that content when she was well) and that's that.
I find the best way to visit is to go for an outing - just a trip to the local Spar supermarket then lunch out will do. It's a distraction technique that works relatively well. Anything rather than being trapped in her room and unable to escape the tale of woe!
I don't want to disparage anyone who cares for their relative themselves, I just know none of us could do it and the alternative (in her own home with live-in carers) wouldn't work. Doesn't mean we don't all have a constant niggle in the back of our minds that we should at least try it, if only to prove that it wouldn't be any better!
A good CH will supply stimulation, immediate response to any medical emergency, warmth, company, good food, cleanliness, personal hygiene, outings, activities. With all those plusses it would take a very big minus to weigh the scales in favour of home care.
Some people are a lot more wonderful than me and want to do it, but we would at best have Mum back in her own home with full-time carers. What would that bring? Upside, a little more independence. Downside? from past experience that would include wandering off at night and knocking on strangers' doors; not eating properly or at all; much lower standards of cleanliness; repeated claims that she hated the house and wanted to buy a new one (that was an expensive aborted exercise last time around!); falling out with and sacking of carers on a regular basis and - the biggie - not being any happier than she is now.
Of course if we didn't like the CH we wouldn't let her stay there. But it couldn't be better. She's bright and active when we are not there. Seeing friends and family triggers a "get me outta here" reaction which is difficult to deal with but as others have said can't be taken at face value. She's unhappy because of her condition (and actually she was never really that content when she was well) and that's that.
I find the best way to visit is to go for an outing - just a trip to the local Spar supermarket then lunch out will do. It's a distraction technique that works relatively well. Anything rather than being trapped in her room and unable to escape the tale of woe!
I don't want to disparage anyone who cares for their relative themselves, I just know none of us could do it and the alternative (in her own home with live-in carers) wouldn't work. Doesn't mean we don't all have a constant niggle in the back of our minds that we should at least try it, if only to prove that it wouldn't be any better!