This week I contacted the person I was told was my fathers IMCA by the agency used by my SS to ask when they had last visited my father.
As people may be aware I have been 'banned' from seeing my father by CH/SS as they don't like me asserting my fathers rights and of course the never ending ongoing POVA investigation which I have been told started in 2009 ( come on SS why waste tax payers money if you have dirt on me prove it )
The person I thought was his IMCA told me they hadn't seen him in weeks but could assure me he was loving it in the CH. How odd when on the audio files on his blog site he says otherwise. They reluctantly agreed to visit him on my request and as a result of a follow up call today told me he said he was unhappy there and wanted to return to his home to me and that they would tell SS. When I asked what action they would take to address his other complaints (after all that is what they are paid for) I was told that they were not his IMCA and that in fact many agencies were involved with him. They declined to say whose these agencies were or give me names and contact details.
At the moment I have no idea who his IMCA is or even if one exists and his wishes that I act for him are still ignored. A serious violation of MCA.
I read Lord Falconer's intro to the MCA code of practice today which I have quoted below. Given this violation of the code all I could think of saying after reading it is what my father says when I tell him why SS think he is mental and have prevented me from seeing him 'a load of Bo%$o/#s'
As people may be aware I have been 'banned' from seeing my father by CH/SS as they don't like me asserting my fathers rights and of course the never ending ongoing POVA investigation which I have been told started in 2009 ( come on SS why waste tax payers money if you have dirt on me prove it )
The person I thought was his IMCA told me they hadn't seen him in weeks but could assure me he was loving it in the CH. How odd when on the audio files on his blog site he says otherwise. They reluctantly agreed to visit him on my request and as a result of a follow up call today told me he said he was unhappy there and wanted to return to his home to me and that they would tell SS. When I asked what action they would take to address his other complaints (after all that is what they are paid for) I was told that they were not his IMCA and that in fact many agencies were involved with him. They declined to say whose these agencies were or give me names and contact details.
At the moment I have no idea who his IMCA is or even if one exists and his wishes that I act for him are still ignored. A serious violation of MCA.
I read Lord Falconer's intro to the MCA code of practice today which I have quoted below. Given this violation of the code all I could think of saying after reading it is what my father says when I tell him why SS think he is mental and have prevented me from seeing him 'a load of Bo%$o/#s'
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 is a vitally important
piece of legislation, and one that will make a real
difference to the lives of people who may lack mental
capacity. It will empower people to make decisions
for themselves wherever possible, and protect
people who lack capacity by providing a lexible
framework that places individuals at the very heart
of the decision-making process. It will ensure that
they participate as much as possible in any decisions
made on their behalf, and that these are made in their
best interests. It also allows people to plan ahead for
a time in the future when they might lack the capacity,
for any number of reasons, to make decisions for
themselves.