The hospital never did admit they were wrong, they still maintain it would have been illegal. But they re-did his assessment with the social worker, and changed his primary need from mental to physical. They said his needs had changed since last week's assessment! Ticks in boxes were all they cared about.
We have not re-raised the issue on continuing care but will when we get dad safely settled. We have still not received the letter saying he can't have it, so it is difficult to appeal. We don't want to jeopardise the move today. I still think he should be eligible since one of the main criteria is that the patient is a danger to themselves or others, and that was their objection to us moving him to a non-dementia home. Maybe winning one argument will have lost us the other !
We have not re-raised the issue on continuing care but will when we get dad safely settled. We have still not received the letter saying he can't have it, so it is difficult to appeal. We don't want to jeopardise the move today. I still think he should be eligible since one of the main criteria is that the patient is a danger to themselves or others, and that was their objection to us moving him to a non-dementia home. Maybe winning one argument will have lost us the other !