Hi all,
I know someone who has been undergoing a long drawn out memory assessment process.
This has culminated in an assessment with a psychiatrist and a CT scan.
The brain scan report states the conclusion is "no acute intracranial abnormality."
Before that there is a descriptive section about findings, and before that there is a section on "provisional diagnosis."
In the provisional section there's some stuff about lesions etc with question marks.
Does anyone know if that section is what they were looking to prove or disprove with the findings?
I'm confused if to whether the provisional diagnosis is an actual diagnosis, given the findings then follow and don't mention the same thing and the final conclusion seems to suggest all was ok.
Thanks
I know someone who has been undergoing a long drawn out memory assessment process.
This has culminated in an assessment with a psychiatrist and a CT scan.
The brain scan report states the conclusion is "no acute intracranial abnormality."
Before that there is a descriptive section about findings, and before that there is a section on "provisional diagnosis."
In the provisional section there's some stuff about lesions etc with question marks.
Does anyone know if that section is what they were looking to prove or disprove with the findings?
I'm confused if to whether the provisional diagnosis is an actual diagnosis, given the findings then follow and don't mention the same thing and the final conclusion seems to suggest all was ok.
Thanks