I wonder if anyone can give me advice on the appeal process for NHS Continuing Healthcare - I have read the National Framework and supporting documents but I am still some what confused by the whole process. I will attempt to explain below our concerns but please bear with me as I've a feeling this will be a bit long winded!
My Mother-in-Law (MIL), Bridget, is in the late stages of vascular dementia and is in a care home since being discharged from hospital recently. She has been assessed for her eligibility for fully funded NHS Continuing Healthcare and this has been refused. We have written to the Commissioning Team informing them that we do not agree with the "Commissioning Team's decision that Bridget's assessed level of needs do not demonstrate eligibility for fully funded NHS Continuing Healthcare". They have previously sent us their checklist that was used in the assessment and on the 11 Domains she was graded as
SEVERE in Cognition,
HIGH in Mobility, they have said that a HIGH in Communication is not evidenced but so I presume they've graded this as MODERATE but this is not clear from the checklist. She is a
MODERATE in Nutrition, Continence and Skin/Tissue Viability and a
LOW need in Drug Therapies/Medication - they have stated that she has
NO NEEDS in Behaviour, Psychological & Emotional, Breathing and Altered State of Conciousness (ASC).
We disagree with the gradings and have written to tell them this. For simplicity we downloaded the checklist and used this to evidence our assessed level of need in each domain - we gave examples of why we graded mum as follows :
BEHAVIOUR - HIGH - She sometimes has callenging behaviour that poses a predictable risk to self or others as she can be aggressive and lash out (physically and verbally) - She refuses to take medication - She can refuse to eat or drink - She lacks insight into her behaviour and doesn't understand the consequences of her actions.
COGNITION - SEVERE- We agree with this! (It's about the only thing we do agree on!)
PSYCHOLOGICAL - HIGH- Because of her VD she is unable to engage in any care planning, support or gain her interest in daily activities - She can have long periods of confusion, her contact with reality is distorted, she sees and hears things that are not there and speaks to people who aren't there! She has no awareness of her surroundings and cannot remember most things all of the time. She is on anti-depressants and is under the care of psychiatrists (well she was when she was at home but since she went into hospital we don't appear to have seen a psychiatrist!)
COMMUNICATION - HIGH- She is unable to make decisions or follow instructions, she can speak but she's not normally speaking about the same things that we are! On occasion she states that her Mum and Dad who have been dead for 40yrs have been to see her! She can respond to prompting for things toileting/eating but her responses cannot be relied upon.
MOBILITY - HIGH- We agree on this level
NUTRITION - HIGH- Back in January 10 the hospital said that she needed a PEG feed or she would not survive... we said no but she's still here! The have said that she would need to go into a home that can administer Subcutaneous Fluids - she was on a drip but they took her off it in hospital and she is no longer on Sub Cuts in the home that she is in - She can and does refuse to eat or drink and will sometimes say she's finished eating when she hasn't had anything at all. The hospital state in their decision that she has but on weight (over the week they were referring to) but prior to being in hospital she went from a size 14 to a size 8 in a matter of months - She would only eat in hospital with assistance and miraculously prior to discharge (and assessment) they were giving her that assistance.
CONTINENCE - HIGH- Without intervention Bridget is doubly incontinent - She has to be prompted to use the toilet (then not always successfully) - She was totally incontinent in hospital until toilet habits started to be re-established by intervention of hospital staff in preparation for discharge (and assessment - Call me cynical!)
SKIN INTEGRITY - MODERATE- Level of need agreed
BREATHING - LOW- Bridget can be short of breath after walking short distances - She had a heart valve op in 2006.
DRUG THERAPIES - MODERATE- Bridget cannot take her medication unaided and can refuse to take it at all - she ordinarily spits the tablet out or refuses to swallow - She was prescribed Haloperidol in hospital due to difficult behaviour and in hosp they gave her anti-depressant in liquid form as she was difficult.
ASC - HIGH (at least)- Bridget's contact with reality is distorted - she can have delusions or hallucinations and has very little understanding of reality - she often has conversations with people who are not there!
Thanks for bearing with me... now to the confusing bit...
The Customer Service Manager has written back to us regarding our letter appealing their decision and they have stated that there are several options open to us now, I'm not sure what they all are but here's my understanding... we can either go through Local Dispute Resolution Process (which again doesn't look too easy) or direct our comments through the Complaints procedure - In the documentation they sent back it states that "a request for a review is NOT appropriate" if we wish to challenge "The content of the eligibility criteria" - Now am I reading this wrong, it's the eligibility criteria or their so called grading of this criteria that's in issue is it not - They have said that rather than a review our issues should be dealt with through NHS Manchester's complaints procedure. I need to respond to their communication soon and I'm at a loss... do I:
a) Go through the complaints procedure
b) Go through Local Resolution
or
c)..... I'm hoping that option c will come from your responses. Can I skip Local Resolution and go to the Strategic Health Authority for an Independent Review (I think this is only possible if the Authority decides it's possible but am not sure about this) or is it advisable to go through option b first...
Any advice you give me will be gratefully received.. I'm drowning in a sea of paperwork, national frameworks, guidelines and emails (there are 10 siblings in Bridget's family and discussing and explaining this will all of them is not easy).
I sometimes think I know what I'm talking about and then I think again and am totally confused!! Please help...