Margarita said:
Tender Face
Does your mum not get Attendance allowance? am sure that is not mean tested
She does, and I believe you're right, and I'm not sure I am comfortable with it at times.
This is what I am struggling with, perhaps. AA is not means tested, yet other benefits are. Why? I think I need to be asking this of my MP not TP!
Mum's AA more than covers the cost of the 'Care on Call' service we had installed for her following her hip replacement (no suggestion of AD at the time - AA purely on 'physical' grounds).
She gets upset sometimes when no-one has called her from 'CoC' to see how she is, and have to reiterate what the service is all about, bless!
Other than that service she/we are not 'strictly' paying for anything directly related to her needs to be attended to. We discount doing her shopping. laundry, cleaning etc but I guess if I and a few trusted others weren't around she would have to use what money was surplus to 'buy in'.
Because she doesn't have to, should we give the surplus back? Why should she even 'qualify' at all? Her income is more than adequate to pay for what she needs (just now, with the help of personal and private support)... and will be woefully inadequate at some point too..... for now, the 'excess' goes on prawns and trifles and anything else that attends to her emotional or other needs...
I do recognise how unjust that may seem - when some may rely on AA strictly for the purpose for which I think it was 'designed'. Then it's 'sod 'em'.... How many times have I heard mum tell the tale of her wedding cake being made from family and friends 'pooling rations' - she's suffered and worked hard all her bloody life, like so many of her generation.... why does she not deserve that 'little extra'to enjoy some small luxury...????
Soz, Margarita, you asked me a simple question - you should know me better by now!