Hi folks
LONG POST!!
Another question, if I may, about Power of Attorney.
Mum (VAD) agreed to an Enduring Power of Attorney early Sep 07, signed paperwork etc etc. My brother in law in myself are POAs and we registered all the paperwork with the Court of Protection in May this year, letting relevant bodies know (Post Office re pension, banks, utilities etc). So far so good - a few glitches but mostly OK.
Right. THE POST OFFICE re Mum's pension. Long story - I'll try to cut it down.
My bro-in-law is dealing with Mum's pension and wrote to the PO (and called them) re the POA. A certified copy of the POA was sent and was acknowledged. OK, I love him dearly (bro in law, that is) but he's a bloke (lack of attention to detail - apologies, but that's my experience). The letter apparently said that changes on the account could only be made by the account holder and the Attorneys. The account holder? Bells ringing. He didn't notice this.
R. changed the address to his re statements etc. "The law" was/is that Mum would be copied in on the letter.
A poorly worded Change of Address letter was sent to R. confirming so-called change. But...was also sent to Mum, as mentioned. Guess what? Mum thought that she would have to sell her home (mmmm. Did I mention she has dementia?) so called them to say that it was wrong. This was DESPITE the POA being registered and them having a certified copy. They dealt with her directly and followed her wishes, changing the address details back to her. I knew nothing of this and neither did R. They didn't bother to tell us.
Previous to this, they had acknowledged the Power of Attorney to R.
Anyway...a few weeks further on (two days ago). A statement was sent directly to Mum (see above). A phone call at 7.45am two days ago - "I've just had a bank statement and I've got no money". It took 20 mins and a visit face to face to calm her down.
Phone call to PO. A CS rep told me confidently that a registered POA "does not necessarily mean" that they wouldn't deal directly with the customer. You know what I said: "Madam (ooh get me) you're WRONG. Please get your Manager to call me" Nothing I said seemed to make a difference to her.
Call to the Office of Protection. "No, the PO are wrong, they should not under any circumstances be dealing with your mother directly, given that they have a registered POA".
The Manager didn't call. I called again.
Conversation with, believe it or not, the Complaints Manager at the Post Office. Nice chap, very understanding but I had a strange and sneaking suspicion that he just didn't get it.
It would appear that the POA only shows up on the customer account history on their computer systems and that was why Mum's so-calleld "wishes" had been adhered to. He even cheerfully went on to tell me that his department had many conversations with patients suffering from Alzheimers, explaining in a jolly way how his team dealt with them. I was so gob-smacked I forgot to ask just how many of these customers had relatives who had registered a Power of Attorney.
Their sytems don't flag POA. As a "test case" and, I felt, a special facour to me(falls over in amazement), if Mum calls this week, either as a response to the Change of Address letter or anything else, they will pass the call him personally. Don't call during lunchtime, Mum. After that, any further calls will be automatically forwarded to his team, who will be aware of the situation and who will not make any changes on the accouhnt.
Do I have a legal case here? The Court of Protection tells me that I do.
Why is the POST OFFICE having issues with Power of Attorney? Training Issue? Process problem? Ignorance? Arrogance?
Am I just plain and simple wrong?
Does POA (enduring) NOT give you total autonomy over a vulnerable person's legal and financial affairs?
Susan
LONG POST!!
Another question, if I may, about Power of Attorney.
Mum (VAD) agreed to an Enduring Power of Attorney early Sep 07, signed paperwork etc etc. My brother in law in myself are POAs and we registered all the paperwork with the Court of Protection in May this year, letting relevant bodies know (Post Office re pension, banks, utilities etc). So far so good - a few glitches but mostly OK.
Right. THE POST OFFICE re Mum's pension. Long story - I'll try to cut it down.
My bro-in-law is dealing with Mum's pension and wrote to the PO (and called them) re the POA. A certified copy of the POA was sent and was acknowledged. OK, I love him dearly (bro in law, that is) but he's a bloke (lack of attention to detail - apologies, but that's my experience). The letter apparently said that changes on the account could only be made by the account holder and the Attorneys. The account holder? Bells ringing. He didn't notice this.
R. changed the address to his re statements etc. "The law" was/is that Mum would be copied in on the letter.
A poorly worded Change of Address letter was sent to R. confirming so-called change. But...was also sent to Mum, as mentioned. Guess what? Mum thought that she would have to sell her home (mmmm. Did I mention she has dementia?) so called them to say that it was wrong. This was DESPITE the POA being registered and them having a certified copy. They dealt with her directly and followed her wishes, changing the address details back to her. I knew nothing of this and neither did R. They didn't bother to tell us.
Previous to this, they had acknowledged the Power of Attorney to R.
Anyway...a few weeks further on (two days ago). A statement was sent directly to Mum (see above). A phone call at 7.45am two days ago - "I've just had a bank statement and I've got no money". It took 20 mins and a visit face to face to calm her down.
Phone call to PO. A CS rep told me confidently that a registered POA "does not necessarily mean" that they wouldn't deal directly with the customer. You know what I said: "Madam (ooh get me) you're WRONG. Please get your Manager to call me" Nothing I said seemed to make a difference to her.
Call to the Office of Protection. "No, the PO are wrong, they should not under any circumstances be dealing with your mother directly, given that they have a registered POA".
The Manager didn't call. I called again.
Conversation with, believe it or not, the Complaints Manager at the Post Office. Nice chap, very understanding but I had a strange and sneaking suspicion that he just didn't get it.
It would appear that the POA only shows up on the customer account history on their computer systems and that was why Mum's so-calleld "wishes" had been adhered to. He even cheerfully went on to tell me that his department had many conversations with patients suffering from Alzheimers, explaining in a jolly way how his team dealt with them. I was so gob-smacked I forgot to ask just how many of these customers had relatives who had registered a Power of Attorney.
Their sytems don't flag POA. As a "test case" and, I felt, a special facour to me(falls over in amazement), if Mum calls this week, either as a response to the Change of Address letter or anything else, they will pass the call him personally. Don't call during lunchtime, Mum. After that, any further calls will be automatically forwarded to his team, who will be aware of the situation and who will not make any changes on the accouhnt.
Do I have a legal case here? The Court of Protection tells me that I do.
Why is the POST OFFICE having issues with Power of Attorney? Training Issue? Process problem? Ignorance? Arrogance?
Am I just plain and simple wrong?
Does POA (enduring) NOT give you total autonomy over a vulnerable person's legal and financial affairs?
Susan
Last edited: