My husband has had vascular dementia, and possibly Alzheimers, diagnosed 7 years ago but having shown symptoms for quite a while before that.
But what, I ask myself, would have been the benefit of an earlier diagnosis, as is being put forward as a wonderful thing in today's announcement?
When, after a long wait for a memory clinic appointment it was agreed that his memory was not what it should be, I in my ignorance said to the consultant that now this had been established I hoped steps could be taken to stop it getting any worse (ignoramus that I was at that point). The fathead consultant said 'That's what we're here for', which I understood meant yes, decline would be halted, etc.
But the trouble is dementia cannot be halted. My husband is now in a nursing home, well looked after but unutterably miserable and confused, despite being pumped full of drugs. If he had been diagnosed earlier, what good would that have done? If it had been me, I might have researched the condition and then killed myself, but he is terrified of death so even that escape route would not have been open to him.
I can see the point in spending money on research, and support services for both patients and carers, but until there are effective treatments what is the point in early diagnosis, or am I missing something?
Rosalind
But what, I ask myself, would have been the benefit of an earlier diagnosis, as is being put forward as a wonderful thing in today's announcement?
When, after a long wait for a memory clinic appointment it was agreed that his memory was not what it should be, I in my ignorance said to the consultant that now this had been established I hoped steps could be taken to stop it getting any worse (ignoramus that I was at that point). The fathead consultant said 'That's what we're here for', which I understood meant yes, decline would be halted, etc.
But the trouble is dementia cannot be halted. My husband is now in a nursing home, well looked after but unutterably miserable and confused, despite being pumped full of drugs. If he had been diagnosed earlier, what good would that have done? If it had been me, I might have researched the condition and then killed myself, but he is terrified of death so even that escape route would not have been open to him.
I can see the point in spending money on research, and support services for both patients and carers, but until there are effective treatments what is the point in early diagnosis, or am I missing something?
Rosalind